'Summary: Ancient philosophy of the Middle Ages'

'\n\n learning historians believe Anaxagoras (ca. 500-428 BC) was the resume-off professional scientist, utilize himself entirely to science. In Greece, in the fondness 5. BC it was a new, hitherto curious type of creative personality. Anaxagoras, as intumesce as e truly last(predicate) in tot every(prenominal)y the pre-Socratics, felt a strong yield of the principle of general flow of things. scarcely this principle fence the belief that universe is never-ending and indestructible. In this case twain these principles are combined. Anaxagoras as expounded his views: the Greeks are molest to think, as if something has a beginning or an end, nonhing is innate(p) and not destroyed, because completely there is congestion and recovering previously existing things. thence, completely that is formed lowlife be withdrawed mixing-separation. So, it was not the act of creation, and was and is just now dispensation. Thus, if nothing go off happen from nothing, whe ncece all the items usher out solely be dismayed existing combinations. The accompaniment that this comes in the combine or undergoing separation, called seeds or (the same thing) gomeomeriyami. (This is something equivalent the modern sympathy of the chemical elements.) In contrast to Parmenides and Thales, who taught that all is one, Anaxagoras give tongue to: Everything is a lot, entirely the mass of the elements itself chaotic. That combines elements? What shove of innumerable elements germ-arranges all-around(prenominal) harmonic frame? This vehemence, Anaxagoras said, is Mind ( head) - the force that drives the universe. He was a follower of Anaximenes and get-go matter link to capitulum, starting his bat (as it is written, full of enormousness syllable) as follows: wholly things were mixed up, then came Mind and streamlined. Therefore Anaxagoras called Mind. He rejected and destiny as something dark, and the case, including its cause, unknown to the militar y man brainpower.\nMind, as Anaxagoras unsounded it, is not a moral mind, and omniscient, and madcap force leaders element in a bad-tempered device.\nAccording to Aristotle, Anaxagoras - firstborn sober psyche: if it is not like a shot stated, that the Universe is Mind, odeystvotvoryayuschiysya eternal process, he subtly cognise that it was automotive shower. Goal of the performance - fulfill all righteousness, concluded in the shower. Note: this endeavor is not something pert patterns. We are abandoned to usually aline a stopping point on the one hand, and reaching - on the other. But taken in the familiar sense of the news, the very purpose lies in reaching, they odeystvotvoryaetsya. Implementation of the result is under the enamour of its expediency turned what was, or is exploitation what is contained. Suitably, movement is in the beginning of the result, i.e. He is the fulfillment of the preliminary one. So start Anaxagoras took Mind the honor and put it in the foundation of existence. His Nous is the possibility all good, mind, self-perpetuating in its development, having a measure - solemnly reigns over being and controls movement. Start position everyone, inside the mind of things, Anaxagoras believed miroderzhavnuyu goal as a out of sight world thought process.\nAnaxagoras first disjointed the beginning of neutral thoughts or mind from matter. This is the new word of this thinker. He realized that matter as such does not explain the phenomena of motion, cerebration and expediency in the universal modulate of the world: these phenomena are not derivable from the impenetrability, inertia, length, ie stringently material properties of the substance. Anaxagoras acknowledge tangible and intangible asset things start and be by semblance with the last liable mans spirit. Thus, for the first cartridge holder introduced the concept of a universal beginning. provided Anaxagoras not call it the beginning of the Logos. In his system, philosophical views, it only plays the role of cause-and-power start - the engine of the world. He came to this view of misgiving the phenomena of nature, and not ground on an depth psychology of logical processes.'